top of page

Questions and Answers
We have sorted out the more common questions here, maybe you can find the answers here and save your precious time.
Didn't find the answer? Contact us >
常見問題
Film Look Processing
FAQ
Community questions
Film Look Processing (FLP), known as the digital-to-film texture conversion process at Modern Cinema, is similar in principle to Hollywood's Digital-Film-Digital (DFD). Both processes involve printing digital files onto film, which is then developed and scanned to transform the digital files into a physical film. The finished product is currently made on 35mm film with selectable ISO (250D/500T), making the image a truly tangible and visible film image.
The ARRILASER 2 was originally introduced for the long-term preservation of film masters. Its function is to use a laser to directly expose digital images onto the film while the film is being advanced at high speed; this is what we call Film-Out.
In the FLP process, we first prepare the digital file, and then use ARRILASER 2 to output the image to the negative, allowing the image to enter the film's tonal range, grain, contrast and photochemical properties. This step is the core of FLP.
Distinct from the Hollywood 'Digital-Film-Digital' (DFD) workflow, which relies on output parameters and color curves designed for commercial color grading, Film Look Processing (FLP) is grounded in the rigorous standards of the Kodak Imagecare Program.
This standard is derived from extensive experience with photochemical variables—such as temperature, chemical concentration, and development time—and how they influence color deviations. FLP ensures that when digital creators record their digital files back onto film, the physical processing aligns perfectly with Kodak Imagecare quality standards.
以下是我們提供給創作者的中文流程圖:
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/56100d_e109bd29b2f24b7f93aeed8dbc418d14~mv2.jpg
English Version:
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/56100d_81e2616174254ea49222d91a3ee8a00c~mv2.jpg
ARRILASER 2 was not originally designed for the Digital-Film-Digital (DFD) workflow. Its core purpose is to film digital images onto film, including camera negatives and intermediates, for image preservation, master backup, and restoration.
Later, whether it was DFD (Digital-Film-Digital) or FLP (Film Look Processing), these processes were actually figured out by a group of film enthusiasts, colorists, and post-production technicians themselves. Through the control of commercial color grading equipment, film characteristics, color curves, and scan-to-digital conversion, they evolved into the workflows we are familiar with today.
Based on our practical experience, we recommend two digital approaches to applying FLP.
The first is: creative aesthetics-oriented, using FLP as a tool for shaping visual style.
After editing is complete, export the DPX file for FLP (Film Lamination), using the film as a special "filter" to create more diverse visual effects through the film's density. This is more suitable for CGI animation or creative works requiring specific visual effects.
The second method is: Precise Appearance Orientation, using FLP to ensure the realism and stability of color gradations.
After editing is complete, the DPX file is output as an FLP, so that the digital footage is presented on film. The purpose is not to create a "film look", but to ensure accurate controllability of color during the color adjustment stage.
From a development perspective, FLP is not simply about creating products or images, but rather a workflow formed by the crystallization of technology. We also explored the significance of this workflow for creators:
1. Images are no longer limited by pixels.
Because images are converted from digital files to physical film, as long as the original film exists, the digital images are no longer subject to the encoding limitations of the time of shooting.
2. This reduces the "errors" caused by different cameras.
Even with identical settings on each camera, multi-camera shooting can still result in color and lighting discrepancies. Therefore, FLP (Film Latitude, Latitude, and Longitude) is suitable for unifying footage from different lenses or with digital errors.
3. It reduces the time spent on color grading and color correction.
To truly achieve a "film negative" look, the colorist must have a thorough understanding of the ISO colors of film under different light sources and perform simulations. This process consumes a significant amount of time and calibration. We believe that using the FLP workflow can substantially reduce the time spent on color grading, and due to the consistent color density, we can further reduce the need for color management for each segment of footage.
4. Makes virtual studios or CGI look more realistic.
When we looked at DFD practices abroad, we found that most of the time, in virtual studios or CGI effects, color grading requires higher density colors for creation, or virtual studios need to remove moiré patterns. However, by utilizing the imaging and rendering characteristics of film, layers can be stacked more effectively, making it look more realistic.
bottom of page

